DAPNET Forums Archive › Forums › Associated Organizations, Sponsors, & Collaborators › Draft Animal Logging Association Working Group › Motion to accept vote
- This topic has 15 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 5 months ago by
lancek.
- AuthorPosts
- November 23, 2009 at 3:45 pm #41110
Scott G
ParticipantWe have allowed sufficient time for everyone to weigh in..
The results:
#1 Do we adopt in final form the name, mission statement, and four goals that have been decided on previously?
Yea 9 Nay 0#2 Do we adopt “Share techniques and strategies” as a 5th goal? (A nay vote would keep the four we have. The ability to add additional goals in the future is always an option.)
Yea 1 Nay8I need a motion to accept the vote and adopt the name, mission statement, and goals as written and stated below. Some one please follow up with a second on the motion.
Name of Effort/Organization
“Draft Animal Powered Forestry, International” (DAPFI)
Mission Statement
“To promote the use of draft animal powered timber harvesting methods that support positive impact forest management”
Primary Goals
1) “To improve opportunities for draft animal forestry practitioners to unite regionally, and internationally, to share information, work, markets, and advocacy.”
2) “To serve as a networking, clearinghouse and contact information for individuals and organizations involved in animal powered forestry throughout the world.”
3) ”To advance an ecological perspective of forest management, based on the use of draft animals, and other low impact/low input strategies.”
4) ”Work with researchers to study and publish ecological benefits of animal logging.”
I’ll follow up with a new thread after this has been accepted (or not) to work on the next steps.
Thanks for everyones patience. We are a reclusive lot…
November 23, 2009 at 3:48 pm #55571john plowden
ParticipantI’ll second the motion –
JohnNovember 23, 2009 at 3:54 pm #55575lancek
ParticipantIf Jhon wasnt the second then Ill second the motion if he was then ok Ill thrid the motion
November 23, 2009 at 4:43 pm #55564Scott G
ParticipantAll those in favor reply with “Aye”, those opposed reply “Nay”
November 23, 2009 at 5:54 pm #55572john plowden
Participantaye aye aye just to get past the ten character minimum
johnNovember 23, 2009 at 5:57 pm #55568Jim Ostergard
ParticipantAye it is for me too. Thanks for the good work Scott.
jimbojimNovember 23, 2009 at 5:58 pm #55563Carl Russell
ModeratorI’ll say yes, Carl
November 23, 2009 at 7:02 pm #55570cedarriverhorselogging
ParticipantI will say yes
November 23, 2009 at 7:28 pm #55562Gabe Ayers
KeymasterMoving on with all yes’s at this point….me too.
Heard that Simon is getting washed away in the UK….hope his horses can swim as well as they log…..
November 23, 2009 at 8:50 pm #55569simon lenihan
ParticipantThe answer is yes to all.
simon lenihanNovember 23, 2009 at 9:57 pm #55565Scott G
ParticipantLogs stay cleaner when you’re yarding (floating) across the water, Simon? 🙂
November 23, 2009 at 11:02 pm #55567Rick Alger
Participantyes .
November 23, 2009 at 11:09 pm #55576lancek
ParticipantYes to all for me Scott
November 24, 2009 at 2:22 am #55573Iron Rose
Participantyes for me too
November 24, 2009 at 12:21 pm #55574TaylorJohnson
Participantyes for me also. Taylor Johnson
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.